Sunday Homily, May 27, Pentecost

Readings: Acts 2, 1-11; Psalm 104; 1 Corinthians 12, 3-13; John 20, 19-23

Breaking Out

We had been traveling all night and all the next day to reach Nairobi recently. I was dead, we were all dead when we got off the plane about nine in the evening.

This is the airport that witnessed a lion walk in one night and lie down right in the lobby. In the 80’s. The airport borders the Nairobi game park. It used to be wide open, but now is glassed into sections, probably for security, if not lions. 

I remember when I got off of the plane, I said to myself, "Okay, Stack, it is time to try your Swahili." So as I walked down a corridor I saw a cleaning lady, a little, middle aged Kenya woman, and I put together a simple question, "Where is the bathroom?"  (Choo kiko wapi?) Granted, I could even see the bathroom down the corridor a bit. But I wanted to break out. 

After I asked this simple question, the little lady looks at me and says, "WHAT??!!" in this loud impatient voice. Talk about being deflated! I was ready to chuck the whole language. I was embarrassed.  It was like no more Swahili for me. English. 

However, as I got beyond her and the comment, I remembered that Kenyans are not as good with Swahili as Tanzanians. I was using Tanzanian quality. Maybe she, too, was just tired and worn out with rich tourists. 

Whatever it was, I renewed my intention and started talking with the immigration & security people.  There I got a pretty good receptions. And then our driver from the Lutheran Guest House went crazy.  That was consoling. 

I talk about this because what I had with that little lady was a type of a pentecost experience. I was scared like those people in the room. Scared even before I talked with the lady.  Then I was more scared and discouraged. Fortunately, because I knew I used to have the language well enough, I broke out again and it worked. In fact, finally I realized it felt like getting back on a bicycle after 20 years.  I just took off. 

This pentecost experience pits risk vs fear. We are all like those fellows in the upper room. We can be scared of so many things. Even scared of standing up here and reading. Scared of speaking out, of leaving a job I don’t like, of taking a new job, or hundreds of other scares. Getting married!

Growth involves risking to break out of the trap of fear. When I break out, even if I fail, consolation results.

What risk are you afraid of today?

Download the homily as an mp3 file

Similar Posts

  • Sunday Homily, February 11, 2007 – 6th Sunday, Ordinary Time

    Readings: Jeremiah 17, 5-8; Psalm 1; 1 Corinthians 15, 12-20; Luke 6, 17-26.

    Jeremiah – Picture this: all the students & faculty are assembled.  You go before them and tell them that they are all lazy, selfish, egotistical, and fat.  Change or you will fail in life. They boo you.  The principal, too, gets up and says the same.  You and the principal love these people.

    After school you pass through the parking lot & the kids curse you, trash you, throw rocks at your car, and spit on you.  Same with the principal.  The atmosphere in the school and attitude of the students goes down. 

    This is where we find Jeremiah and Yahweh.  They have warned the people and the people have rebelled.  Both Jeremiah and Yahweh are downhearted.  What we read is Yahweh’s response while he is in this depressed mood, in the eyes of the writer.

    Corinthians – Paul continues to address the people of Corinth, this time about the resurrection.

    Trust No One?

    When I first came home from East Africa, I spent the winter at the Jesuit church in downtown Houston until I could get a program in Dallas.  One early evening after visiting my mom here in Dallas, I was returning to Houston.  I had my airline ticket and went to Love Field.  I stood in that Houston line, got to the counter, gave the attendant my ticket, and she says to me, “You are at the wrong airport.” 

    Talk about feeling like a fool.  I had an A.A. ticket instead of Southwest.  To compound my feelings, when the girl asked if I would like to buy a ticket, I realized I had about $20 in change, no more.  No credit or debit card yet.  I was just back from Africa.  Plus, now I was alone, because my mom had gone back home.  No cell phone naturally. 

    Despite the desire I had to crawl in a hole and disappear, I figured I had to do something dramatic quickly.  So I turned around, faced the long line of afternoon commuters, addressed everyone, and asked if someone could loan me the fare, which was only about $35 those days. 

    Guess what happened.  Yes, a lady from Victoria stepped up and loaned me the money.  What would I have done if everyone had just ignored me?   Wow, it scares me to imagine it.  She was very cordial and I sent her the money later from Houston. 

    “Cursed is the one who trusts in human beings.”  Remember what I said about Yahweh being depressed and hurt by his people’s behavior.  The writer of Jeremiah is imagining what Yahweh’s response would have been.  The writer might have just been hurt by his best friend. 

    Trouble is, the person who trusts not one single person, that person is poverty stricken, truly poor.  You hear occasionally of people whose attitude toward others is that everyone is out to get you.  Pretty pessimistic.  Probably a sentiment resulting from hurts earlier in life.   

    Today with our gift of the New Testament, we might modify this.  I would suggest that we arrive at the Kingdom today by trusting in God and by trusting people.  We enter the Kingdom more easily with a community, like we enjoy here. 

    If I did not trust people, I would not have asked the crowd for air fare.  If the lady from Victoria did not trust, I would not have received a gift.  As it was, we both arrived in the Kingdom—Houston Hobby.

    When was the last time you were blessed by trusting?

    Click here to download the homily as an mp3 file.

  • |

    Sunday Homily, June 7, 2015, Corpus Christi, B

    Readings:

    Exodus  24,  3-8,  We will do everything that the Lord has told us.

    Psalm 116,    I will take the cup of salvation, and call on the name of the Lord.

    Hebrews 9, 11-15,   He is mediator of the new covenant.

     Mark  14, 12-16, 22-26, While they were eating, he took bread and said the blessing.

                                                                                                    

    Beth 1

    The Wedding of Sarah & Beth (Rosemary's niece), Saturday, Mechanicsburg, PA, United Church of Christ, with ministers Karen and John, plus about 200 friends and supporters.

     

    Todays readings talk about God’s love for his people, in Exodus about Moses and in Mark about Jesus’ expressions of love with his friends.  The words of Jesus (“This is my body”; “this is my blood)” were an established ritual formula repeated in early Christian gatherings as part of their remembrance of Jesus and the Passover he shared with them before he died.  Mark’s Gospelwas the first, written about 25-30 years after Jesus’ death.  Even before Mark, Paul was writing in his letters about our being the body of Christ and about our being intimately united with him.

    In the homily I want to take this opportunity to talk some about special human relationships, couples in partnership or marriage.  

     

    Beth 2

    Two very hospitable ministers, Karen & John.  Note the bare feet, out of reverence for the sanctuary.

     

    Homily:   Last Sunday Stack talked about relationship and how Christian theology refers to God one, and yet as Father, Son and Holy Spirit, three persons in relationship.  After I planned to talk about Corpus Christi today, I spent over 8 hours yesterday at a workshop with over 200 couples.  Most of them were married couples married anywhere from only 4 months to 45 years; some were engaged. The event is called “Safe  Conversation” and is led by Harville Hendrix and Helen Hunt.  

    It is based on the new science of couple relationships or marriage.  

    1)  Brain science:  At the time scientists had already mapped out the known world on the outside, Sigmund Freud was mapping out the inner world, the human mind and the unconscious.  His emphasis was on the individual.  It wasn’t till the 1990’s that neuroscientists began to map the brain and better understand its workings, especially the notion of neuroplasticity, that the brain is changeable by means of the thoughts we run through it.  

    The brain has a ‘mind of its own’.   The lower/primitive brain (brain stem) is in place to protect and defend (like a crocodile).  Anxiety and fear are triggered when any  danger is sensed.  Can order production of cortisol and adrenalin to help protect and defend, and from which we can experience fear and anxiety.  The higher/newer brain (frontal cortex) is in place to think and analyze, cooperate and create (like a wise owl).   Can order production of endorphins, dopamine from which we can experience joy.  

     

    Begin

                                                              Leo, the candle lighter at work.

                                                                                                                            

    2)  Marriage research: We now know you can’t effectively help a couple in relationship by trying to ‘fix’ one of partners; rather, must provide healing work on the space between the partners, the relationship behaviors themselves.  We also know that negativity is a high predictor of relationship distress and of risk for divorce. Negativity is a natural stage of relationship, when we wake up and find out our partner is different from us or doesn’t match our ideal dream partner.

    3)  Safe Conversation:  The key component, which anyone can learn, is to practice ‘safe conversation’ again and again and again and again.  Safe conversation provides what it implies, safety.  It calms the crocodile and reduces negativity.  It does this through the structure of the conversation. This allows the couple to again experience deep joy and aliveness as they did in the first stage of their relationship.

    Question:   Are you up to date on the new science of relationship?  And How are you at eliminating negativity in your relationships? These couple workshops are provided currently with no fee, and include childcare and breakfast and lunch.  In addition there are child and teen programs offered at the same time so families are on same page in the process. Stack posted information on the last two workshops in his blog.I don’t know when the next one will be, but I invite you to look at their  web site – www.familywellnessdallas.org

     

  • Sunday Homily, February 24, 2019, 7th Ordinary Time

    IMG_5948

     

    "Welcome in, Everybody," sez Crazy Patricia.

     

    Readings: 

    1 Samuel 2, 7-9, 12-13, 22-23,   I would not harm the Lord's anointed.  

    Psalm 103,  The Lord is kind & merciful. (a good one, a favorite line)

    1 Corinthians 15, 45-49,    The first man was from earth; the second from heaven.

    Luke 6,  27-38, Do good to those who hate you.

     

    Team

     

     

    " Welcome in, Everybody," from the whole team.

     

    Observations  on 1 Samuel

    Our 1st reading today is from the first book  in a fun & interesting 4 book series which is somewhat historical, somewhat metaphorical & imaginative.

    The books: 1 & 2 Samuel, 1 & 2 Kings.  The first two books center on 3 main characters, the first ever kings of the Israelites, namely Samuel, the first king, Saul, the 2nd king, an insecure, jealous, and paranoiac man, and the Great King David, a colorful character. 

    Ever hear of Bathsheba?   Check out David in 2 Samuel.

     

    John

     

    John reading his marvelous updating of today's Gospel.

     

    The last 2 books, 1 & 2 Kings, describe the beautiful times of Solomon and the building of the temple.  The final book of the 4 describes the bad ways of the people which lead to the bad days of the Babylonian captivity.

    Estimated time of composition, ca, 555, during the Babylonian Captivity.

     

    IMG_5971

     

    Wake up, John.  Punch him, Karen.

     

    Homily, February 24

    When I was studying  theology in Toronto from ’68-’72, the fall of my second year we had to take a course in moral theology.  We were part of a consortium of seminarians.  We Jesuits were the biggest group with ca. 40 guys.  There were probably 6-8 other groups, even some individuals.   All guys.

    We Jesuits lived in a large building in a northern suburb called Willowdale.  There were four classes with a total of probably 200, plus 6-8 Jesuit professors.  We had classes on the down town campus of U. of Toronto.  

     

    IMG_5972

     

    Our bread baker and hostess with the mostest welcoming everybody to communion.

     

    The fall of my second year our class had to take a course in moral theology.   Fundamentally it was how to administer the Sacrament of Reconciliation, or Confession, plus other moral questions.  For example, like torture, capital punishment, abortion.

    The professor of this rather large class was a young Jesuit priest just graduated from Harvard, named Bryan.  I honestly don’t remember his last name.  Bryan was sharp, liberal, and not blessed with public relations skills. 

     

    IMG_5988

     

    And hiding behind John, Allen & Aggie.

     

    Bryan put off the majority of the class and a group even came to complain to him.  What did Bryan do?  He told them if they did not like him or his presentations, they could go somewhere else.  He did this with more blunt language than I use here.  So all these guys boycotted his class.

    I give all this information as background to my interaction with Bryan in the spring semester of that same academic year.

     

    IMG_5983

     

    Would someone please sit with Sandra.

     

    At the end of our third year the Jesuit program normally had the moral theology exam.  Since my class had already covered the class requirements, some of us thought we would like to take the moral theology exam at the end of the second year.   Get it off the agenda.

    So I get elected to go make the request to, take a guess, Bryan.  He not only denies my request and tells me to wait until the end of year 3, he tells me if I & my buddies do it anyway, he will flunk us all.   We did and he did.   I even went to the Jesuit rector to complain before we took the exam, which, incidentally was in Latin before a board of 3 of the Jesuit faculty.

    So, if I am supposed to love my enemies, do I have to love Brian?   Yes.

     

    IMG_5990

     

    Welcome Home, Beth, our Colorado Snow Bird of the Week.

     

    Two comments.  We are dealing here in Luke with infinite demand.

    At the same time, we are offered infinite acceptance.  For example, my favorite line showing up this morning in the Psalm, The Lord is gracious and merciful, never gets angry, and is abounding in kindness. 

     

    IMG_5985

     

    Help is on the way, Hugh.

  • Sunday Homily 10-4-09, 27th Ordinary Time

    Readings: Genesis 2, 18-24; Psalm 128, May the Lord bless Us all the Days of Our Lives; Hebrews 2, 9-11; Mark 10, 2-16.

    Genesis:

    Date of Compilation: Most likely during the Babylonian Captivity, i.e., around 600-550 BCE.  But the material for the sources was coming together over 200 years.

    Choir 10-4-09

    Authors:  4 major sources–

    The J or Y source (for Yahweh), coming from Judah, the southern half of the divided Jewish state after Solomon's death.

    The E source (for Elohim), coming from Israel, the northern half of the Jewish state which was destroyed by the Assyrians ca. 700 BCE.

    The D source (from Deuteronomy), coming from the revisions of the prophet Jeremiah's & his companions.

    The P source (from the priests), which or who during the Babylonian time took the material from the first 3 sources, wove them together, edited them. 

    How do you know: by text analysis, noting different styles of writing, place references (e.g. mention of the Tigris & Euphrates in our chapter 2, which says "Babylon."), event references, people references, and agendas behind the stories (e.g. Sabbath & Creation Story #1).

    Subject Matter: A panorama stretching from the two stories of creation, through The Fall, Cain & Abel, Noah & the flood, the Tower of Babylon, the Patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, & Jacob, Joseph and his jealous brothers, Joseph as governor of Egypt & his brothers' visit & eventual migration to Egypt. 

    Our Selection: we will read the whole of creation story #2, chapter 2.  The story comes from the Y or J source, but note the mention of the Tigris & Euphrates, which a person in Babylon would appreciate  ( A clue that a priestly source has inserted a geographic reference.  Why would a Jewish high priest be familiar with Babylonian rivers?  Babylonian Captivity. ).

    Birthdays 10-4-09

    Hebrews: We will read from Hebrews for the next 6 weeks (excluding All Saints), right up to the feast of Christ the King, which marks the end of the liturgical year.  Then we begin Advent and a new liturgical year.

    Author: unknown, but he wrote excellent Greek.  Not Paul.

    When Written: 85-95 CE, i.e., 50 plus years after Jesus' death

    Subject: superiority of Christ.  Rather convoluted.

    Sources St. Louis U. Sundays, John Shelby Spong

    Denni 10-4-09

    Concerning Divorce, Remarriage, & Adultery

    After hearing what was said about divorce and remarriage, I can imagine you are thinking, "Okay, Stack, what are you going to say about this topic?"  I intend to talk about it.  But first, a story.

    The first week of September Rosemary & I went to Seattle to be part of Gloria Eshelbrenner's wedding.  Since it was our first trip to Seattle, we traveled there on Monday.  We had been told that we would not need to rent a car because our little B & B was close to the center of town.  Great. 

    So I am looking at transportation from the airport, shuttle, Gray Line tour bus, or city bus for ca. $2.  Guess which I suggested to Rosemary.  It is not only the cheapest, but the most adventurous.  We took the Gray Line.  Which deposited us in the center of town, where we walked a block or so, having an ice cream along the way, to a city bus, which turned out to be an electric bus.  Great. 

    Half way along the route our electric bus breaks down.  The overhead pulley disconnected from the electric cable and the driver could not reconnect it. 

    We had been talking with people around us and when we stopped a number tried to help us find where we were going.  Finally a guy stepped forward, asked the address, said he thought he lived close to our address, and told us to follow him. 

    We walked up hill, caught another electric bus, rode a mile or so, got off, turned up a street, and the guys said, "There is your house.  I live in that house across the street."  We were touched by the hospitality of the people on the bus and especially of this new neighbor. 

    I remember this incident when I reflect on the words of Jesus, "whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her; and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery."  Strong words.  Five comments: Jesus' words, hospitality, Mark's environment, Mark's intention, for us.

    First, you may put your money on it that these words are not words of Jesus.  Students of the bible consider almost no words directly attributed to Jesus to be his exact words. 

    Why?  Because Mark did not know Jesus and he is writing from oral sources 30 years after Jesus' death.  They had no recording machines in those days.  Can you remember what happened 30 years ago?  Super Bowl winner?  Pittsburg.  President?  Carter.  Big news?  Ayatolloh Khomeini held embassy hostages.  A prophet of that time?  MLK had been killed in '68.  We can remember his line, "I have a Dream,' because it has been repeated so often. 

    Secondly, Jesus' main message about God: hospitable, like those people in Seattle.  He talks hospitality, inclusion, not exclusion, acceptance, not rejection.  E.g., Prodigal Son, to name only one.

    Thirdly, Mark's environment.  Bible students think whoever put this booklet together wrote for Gentile Christians living in the Roman Empire, probably in Rome or Antioch, Greece.  He (she unlikely) wrote just after the destruction of Jerusalem & the temple by the Romans after a failed Jewish revolt, 70 CE.  More persecution was expected throughout the Empire.  (Note that the Jews never again had possession of Jerusalem until 1948 when it was granted them by the Allies after WW II & the Holocaust)

    Fourth, Mark's intention: encourage these Gentile Christians living in probably Rome to remain faithful despite coming troubles.  One method: keep families united.  Don't break up.  Marriages were arranged by families at this time.  Kids did not choose their parent, kids did not choose their spouses.  Marriage strengthened bonds for self defense and economic survival.  Divorce ruptured these bonds, not just between the couple.  Remarriage caused even more contention.  Thus, divorce & remarriage is strongly discouraged for even survival reasons.

    Tom 10-4-09
     

    Fifth: for ourselves.  Context vs basic message.

    A.  Understand the context of our passage, Mark's background and intention.

    B.  Consider this the ideal, the infinite demand.

    C.  Remember the basic Christian message: God's infinite acceptance &  hospitality, like the people in Seattle.

    What have you gotten for yourself from these observations?

    Picture 1:  The Choir, Shonda, Celeste, & Ray

    Picture 2:  Birthdays & Anniversaries, Frank, Richard & Sheila

    Picture 3:  Denni reading Genesis

    Picture 4:  Tom Reading Hebrews

     

  • Sunday Homily 8-7-11, 19th Ordinary Time

    Readings: 1 Kings 19, 9-13; Psalm 85, Lord, let us see your Kindness, and grant us you Salavation; Romans 9, 1-5; Matthew 14, 22-33

     

     Intro to Readings, Fr. Tony

     Our first reading today is from the First Book of Kings. These two books were mainly written to describe the period right after the reign of King David. They cover Solomon, the division of the kingdom at his death into Northern and Southern kingdoms and subsequent kings until both kingdoms are overrun and the people are taken into captivity.  But in the middle we have a whole section on prophets, primarily Elijah and Elisha.

    Beginning 8-7-11 

     Today’s reading is rather fascinating. The prophet Elijah is in a cave, he has been told that Yahweh is coming.  Given the experiences when the king arrived, the expectation is for a big fanfare, at least a motorcade!  But that is not what happens.  Keep this in mind when we get to the homily.  Let’s listen to the reading!

    Our 8-7-11 

    Homily

     As you well know by now, each of the gospels were written for a particular audience and at a particular time in history.  But as Christians we believe that God’s Word is just as pertinent for us today as it was for those early Christians they were originally written for.  Today’s gospel is a perfect example of this.  Remember the discussion we have had before about the synoptic gospels, namely that Mark wrote the first gospel, then Matthew and Luke both copied from Mark and added some other material.  Each writer had a specific audience they were writing for and a specific purpose for their writing.  The story of Jesus walking on the water and calming the sea, which we have just read, is also in Mark’s Gospel (Mk 6; 45-52) and in both gospels it comes right after the feeding of the multitude.  Matthew adds a little bit to the story, namely Peter’s walking on the water.  But there are other more significant differences.  Throughout Mark’s gospel, the disciples are presented as being blind to who Jesus is.  In fact this story in Mark’s gospel ends with the comment “they were utterly and completely dumbfounded, their minds were closed” (Mk 6: 52). In Matthew’s gospel the reaction is completely different.  Matthew tells us “they bowed down before him and said, ‘truly you are the Son of God’”

    Communion 8-7-11 

     I mention the two gospel accounts for a reason.  In Mark’s gospel the disciples are blind to who Jesus is – their minds are closed.  In Matthew, while they “have little faith”, remember Jesus said that to them in today’s reading, that little faith is enough for them to bow down and adore.  I know that in my own life I sometimes feel like I have very little faith, I am grateful to be able to be here each week and have that little bit strengthened and confirmed, by your presence and by our celebration of the Eucharist.  What I find most interesting is if we go to the end of Mark’s gospel. By the way, there are two endings, the first ending (Mk 16: 8) which was probably the original ending, it is Easter Sunday morning, we find the story of the women being told by the young man in a white robe that Jesus is not there, that he has gone before them to Galilee.  They ran away, frightened “for they were afraid”.  What a way for it to end.  Their minds were closed, they could never see Jesus for who he really was, they don’t appear at this time to even have a “little faith” and they end up afraid.  Matthew ends his gospel with the disciples on the mountain with Jesus at his ascension. (Matt 28: 16ff). Again they bow down and adore him, and Matthew uses the exact same word as he used for “adore” as when they were in the boat, and Jesus ends the gospel commenting on their “little faith” but that they should “know that I am with you always, even to the ends of time”.  In other words the little bit of faith was enough.

    Leo 8-7-11 

     I take great encouragement from this.  My sense is that most of the time I have a little faith.  I do my best to believe, and it seems that it is enough to know that Jesus has promised to be with me always. The alternative, the blindness of Marks disciples is stark, one is left in fear!

    Ryan 8-7-11 

     Our presence here today has to be due to a little faith.  Then know that you are not alone.  Remember the promise, I am with you always, even to the ends of time!

    Picture 1:   Mass begins with Tony

    Picture 2:   Our Father

    Picture 3:   Communion

    Picture 4:   Leo

    Picture 5:    Ryan collecting the books after Mass with mom & dad behind, Jim & Michelle 

  • Sunday Homily, May 7, 2017, 4th Easter

      Cathy

     

    Say Rosemary & Cathy, "Happy Kentucky Derby Weekend and welcome in."

     

    Readings:

    Acts of the Apostles  2, 14, 36-41  Let the whole house of Israel know.

    Psalm 23,  The Lord is my shepherd.  (Beautiful, consoling)

    1 Peter 2, 20-25, By his wounds have you been healed.

     John 10, 1-10,  Whoever enters through the gate is the shepherd. 

     

     

    IMG_2539

     

    Welcome back to Dallas, Ann, and to our community.  You are one of our best all time friends.

     

    The Three Best

    Whenever I go on a trip like the one Rosemary & I just did with Viking on the Elbe River in Eastern Germany, I get questions.  Like, ‘What was the best thing?’  I would like to talk briefly about 3 best things that struck me, a Berlin chapel, a church door, and a concentration camp. 

     

      Tower bombed

     

    This bell tower is all that is left of the old gothic Kaiser Wilhelm church in central Berlin.  It is preserved as a remembrance.

     

    In the heart of Berlin there used to be a large gothic church called Kaiser Wilhelm Church.  It was bombed badly in the war and all that is left is a large, beat up bell tower.  Bullet wounds and bomb damage from bottom to what is left of the top.   The bell tower has been preserved as is to remind.

     

      Wilhelm 1

     

    Interior of the Kaiser Wilhelm chapel .   The blue ambiance comes from bricks with glass circles tinted blue, very moving.

     

    Next to the tower a chapel has been built, very plain, a grey box on the outside.  After looking at prewar pictures of the old church, just for the heck of it, I decide to go inside the rather plain chapel.  I am stunned by the simple beauty.  The curved front wall is made of cement blocks with round blue bottle like glass.   A gold, ascending, larger than life-sized Christ hangs right in the middle.   Simple wooden pews.  The blue and gold ambience was stunning. 

    The half destroyed bell tower and the stunningly moving chapel symbolize for me the story of Berlin.

      Wilhelm 2

     

    View of interior from right aisle.  The bell tower in union with this simple chapel symbolize the old and the new Berlin.

     

    Second best experience.  Wittenberg and the church where Martin Luther posted 95 theses, exactly 5 centuries ago on October 31.

    All my training about this event gave me a misconception.  Namely, that Luther was out to start a church revolution.   Nope.

     

    IMG_2423

     

    Wittenburg, Church door where Martin Luther posted his 95 theses 500 year ago this year.  It was a university bulletin board.

     

    The story goes like this.  Luther was a professor at the Wittenberg University.  The church door was a bulletin board.  Professors would post theses which the students were expected to debate the pros and cons of.   Everything was hand written in Latin.  Luther even titled his material as Disputation on the Power & Efficiency of Indulgences.  Disputation is the key word and implied debate of the pros and cons.  It was only later that year or the next that Rome got wind of them and a year later excommunicated Luther and the ideas went viral.

     

      Wittenburg 1

     

    Wittenburg town center.

     

    3 samples of theses:

    #21.  Those indulgence preachers are in error who say that a man is absolved from every penalty and saved by papal indulgences.

    27.  They preach only human doctrines who say that as soon as the money clinks into the money chest, the soul flies out of purgatory.

    32.  Those who believe they can be certain of their salvation because they have indulgence letters will be eternally damned, together with their teachers.

      Church

    St. Mary's Church, Wittenberg.  This is not the Luther church which was more of a college chapel. 

     

    I spent three years, ’62-’65, studying philosophy at Spring Hill College in Mobile.  There were a hundred plus Jesuits engaged in this process.  We debated theses and we debated in Latin.  I took all my philosophy exams in Latin, written and mostly oral.   We had the church position and we had the adversaries.  We were expected to be able to verbally ace those adversaries.  Luther was probably one of our adversaries. 

     

      Women

     

    A small number of the survivors of Ravensbruck. 

     

    This was so déjà vu for me.  I could feel exactly what was going on, no revolt, just debate.  Somebody copied those theses, got them to Rome, and some priest, bishop, or pope over reacted, excommunicated Luther, and a revolt took place among the people.  Could this be taking place today?

     

    Ravensbruck 2

     

    Revensbruck compound & barracks.  100,000 plus women were concentrated here.

     

    Thirdly, Ravensbruck concentration camp for women.  For years I have read about the camps, in particular Ravensbruck.  This camp was set up for women and it was this camp where medical experiments were performed on the women. 

     

      Ravensbruck_camp_barracks

     

    Ravensbrook compound.  The camp is 60 miles north of Berlin.

     

    We drove straight north out of Berlin about two hours on a beautiful day.  When I walked onto the compound I felt I was walking on hallowed, sacred ground. The barracks have all been removed, but the official buildings are still there, the infirmary, the clothes sewing hall, and the men & women officers’ houses.  I stood on the morning assembly ground and could see it all. 

    As human beings we are capable of such horror and such beauty. 

     

    IMG_2544

     

    Ravensbruck today.  The barracks have been removed, but the outlines are still present.  On the left are the work building and the infamous infirmary.  The picture is taken from the assembly area.