Sunday Homily, September 29, 2013, 26th Ordinary Time C

Readings: 

 Amos 6, 1, 4-7,   Woe to the complacent.

Psalm 146,  Praise the Lord, my sould.

1 Timothy 6, 11-16,  Pursue righteousness, devotion, faith, love.

Luke 16, 19-31,  The rich man and Lazarus.

 

IMG_2712

Francis and Gloria Vanderwall.

 

Amos observations :  (from last week's Mass)

What :  One of the 12 minor prophets, only 9 chapters.

Who: 
the book presents the thoughts and observations of Amos, who was a sheep herder
and a fig farmer.  He was born in the southern kingdom of Judah in a
little town south of Jerusalem, but he is condemning the people, especially the
rich, of the northern kingdom, Israel.

Time: 
Amos was active around 755 before Christ, but his words and message were
revised and edited down through the years, especially during the Babylonian
Captivity, around 555 before Christ.  He lives just before the Syrians
destroy the northern kingdom of Israel, around 700 before Christ.



IMG_2710

Francis speaking to the people at Open Window's Saturday seminar.

Message: 
Prayer and sacrifice don’t make up for social injustice and oppression of the
poor by the rich. 

 Today: 
God will punish you rich and prosperous for your abuse of the poor.  Amos
may have seen the threat coming from the Syrians. 

Sources:  Good News Bible, New Interpreter’s Study
Bible, Wikipedia

 

Cupcakes 7-29-13

Cupcakes of The Week to Patricia and Fred (3 years), John (52 years ordained), Torri and Buddy (3 years).

 

Some of Francis’ points in his homily this morning:

  1.  The first sin
    of the rich man is that he is blind.  He
    came and went every day and did not even see Lazarus at his doorstep.  Wealth can blind us, too.
  2. The second sin of the rich man is that even in Hades
    he still thinks he is significant enough to tell Abraham to order Lazarus to
    warn his 5 brothers.  His self image is
    inflated and blinds him to this character flaw.  Entitlement?
  3. The rich man is condemned not because of his wealth in
    itself, but that because of it he feels self righteous.  The trap of wealth, I am better than that one.
  4. There may be a parallel in Luke’s mind between Lazarus
    and Jesus, which comes out in the talk between the rich man and Abraham.  Jesus was poor, died, and returned to
    life.  Were Lazarus to die and return to
    life, neither would he be believed, any more than Jesus was believed.
  5. There is a play on words with Lazarus.  In ancient languages the name Lazarus could
    be equivalent to Abraham.  Therefore,
    Luke rubs it in: Lazarus may be a personification of Abraham himself, lying on the
    doorstep of the rich man who never sees him.

 The lesson: Who is the Lazarus, who is the poor
person at your own doorstep?

Source:   The Liberating Stories of Jesus, Francis Vanderwall


Emma 9-27-13

Emma with her mom, Beth, another Cupcake winner.

 

 

Similar Posts

  • Sunday Homily, March 9, 2008, 5th Lent

    Readings: Ezekiel 37, 12-14; Psalm 130; Romans 8, 8-11; John 11, 1-45.

    Ezekiel: Again we make a big jump, from Samuel & David to the prophet Ezekiel. The time is ca. 580 B.C, the time of the defeat of the Hebrews and the Babylonian captivity.  Ezekiel is warning the people of the calamities that come and ends eventually envisioning a new Jerusalem.

    Blair

    How Many More Years You Got to Appreciate?

    We hear it said all the time that we have around 75 years of life in us.  That means we got 75 Christmases to enjoy, 75 springs and summers, and 75 Thanksgivings.  And that is from the age of Cameron & Reid, Brady & Trey.  Now you kids who are 10 or 15 only have 65 or 60 more birthdays and Easters.  Those of you 50 have only 25 more Christmases.  I have, guess, only 7 more according to the profile. 

    Marriage at 25 means 50 years of fun & companionship.  I got married at 65.  Not much time to experience the fun & companionship. 

    Over the past 5 weeks I have talked about some secrets to making marriage work.

     

    ·       Stay away from divorce, but play,

    ·       don’t expect a perfect marriage, but work for perfect moments,

    ·       plan fun and date regularly,

    ·       empty out the back pack of my junk and keep communicating,

    ·       give with words, listening, and touch & hugs.

    Frank

    This final discussion is both a summary of the five previous weeks and also a focus on appreciation.  Appreciation for the person who agreed to marry me.  The temptation is to rattle off the Spanish saying, "El amor es Ciego," love is blind.  The response to the temptation is appreciation.  Appreciate the perfect moments, the companionship, and the anniversaries.  Celebrate the appreciation.

    We only have a limited number of Christmases & Easters, perfect moments and anniversaries.  Let’s not blow it.  Appreciate each one.

    How many more do you have to celebrate?

                   

    AUDIO: http://mysite.verizon.net/reso7rjy/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/2008-03-09.mp3 

  • Sunday Homily, April 29, 2007 – 4th Sunday of Easter

    Readings: Acts 13, 43-52; Psalm 100; Revelations 7, 9-17; John 10, 27-30

    Acts – More on the travels of Paul and Barnabas.

    How do I know I’m hearing the "Voice?"

    Nine days ago there was a small article in The Dallas Morning News, Friday, April 20, that noted that "Pope Benedict XV has reversed centuries of Roman Catholic teaching on limbo."

    What I was taught as a child was that unbaptized babies went to limbo if they died. So now what?

    Infant baptism was all important. I should even baptize a baby without the parents’ knowledge if I was in a hospital and a baby was dying. Limbo was not heaven, but it sure was not hell, sort of an in between.

    I was reminded by the first reading and the gospel of another belief I was trained in as a child: if you are not Catholic you are going to hell. I remember thinking how sad it was that so many of my parents’ friends, all protestant, were not going to heaven. It seemed weird.

    Paul & Barnabas say that because the Jews rejected Jesus’ word, they condemn themselves as unworthy of eternal life. Likewise, they say that those destined for eternal life came to believe.

    In the gospel Jesus says his sheep hear his voice and he gives them eternal life. Not that I want to be a sheep. Sheep are scared of everything.

    These are two items of belief that I was trained on and they are no longer credible. 50 years from now what other beliefs will end up in the dust bin of history? No meat on Friday ruled my parents’ lives. Where is it? Yes, coming back, I know.

    If there is no limbo, how does this affect the idea of original sin? Is there an original sin? What about the statement that God the Father sent his Son to die for our sins? Is this true?

    Which leads me to ask, how do I know? In the gospel Jesus says, "My sheep hear my voice." How do I know among so many messages and voices that I am hearing the voice? I thought I was hearing the voice as a kid when I believed in limbo and the fact that only Catholics were going to heaven. Was the voice I heard divine or just some person who thought he or she knew? But didn’t. I do not want to be a sheep like I was in my youth, and follow anyone who thinks they know.

    A couple of thoughts about discerning the voice.

    First, I think the real voice gives my spirit peace. The other voices bring violence and turmoil.

    I may not like what the voice whispers in my spirit, but ultimately I am peaceful. I may be dying. The voice says accept.      

    Secondly, the voice gives me self-confidence. The false voices create doubts and lack of a sense of harmony. Like for years I doubted the limbo idea. Some well intentioned soul thought they knew. St. Augustine thought only Catholics go to heaven.

    Like a sheep I could run from the questions. As a person listening to the voice I’ll face my questions.

    Which brings us to The Question: What do you believe in; what are 5 things you believe in?

    Download the homily as an mp3 file.

  • Sunday Homily, May 6, 2007 – 5th Sunday of Easter

    Readings: Acts 14, 21-27; Psalm 145; Revelations 21, 1-5; John 13, 31-35.

    “Love One Another as I Have Loved You?”

    Occasionally in our lives extraordinary moments come along. We experience a special consolation and come away profoundly touched. Last night’s get together was one of those moments.

    We had people celebrating publicly 1, 2, 15, 25, 35, 50,& 60 years of marriage. I felt privileged to be part of the group. I felt doubly privileged to be on the stage with my old coach, teacher, & friend Frank Hart & his wife, Mickey, who knock me over with their 60 years of marriage.

    Two things strike me about what I was watching. First, the people who are celebrating 25, 35, 50, & 60 years of marriage have a peace and happiness about them.

    How am I different after two years of marriage? I am certainly more peaceful than ever. I’ve always felt a lot of inner peace; I feel even more now.

    Secondly, I’ve also discovered that my old insights into marriage still have meaning, namely acceptance and having fun. I hear it said that marriage is work, it is hard. So far I have not seen it. On the contrary, every day Rosemary & I spend together we have fun. We work at planning the fun.

    In the gospel, Jesus tells his followers to love each other as he has loved them. Maybe we are hearing “infinite demand”.

    Psalm 145, our psalm for today gives a picture of how he loves. The line says he is gracious and merciful, never gets angry, and is abounding in love.

    That is our challenge.

    Whom are you loving this way?

    Sorry no audio today.

  • Sunday Homily, May 13, 2007 – 6th Sunday of Easter – Mothers’ Day & First Communion

    Readings: Acts 15, 1-29; Psalm 67; Revelation 21, 10-23; John 14, 23-29

    Mother’s Gift

    Mothers_day_blessing_2 Some years ago after I had returned to Dallas in the 80’s and my mother was still alive, she had to go to the hospital for some procedure. The hospital was the one on LBJ near Webb Chapel, called Deadman in those days.

    She was going to stay for at least a night, so we packed up some of her stuff. It was afternoon. I was driving her west on LBJ and we were talking. Suddenly she patted me on my right thigh and said, "I’m proud of you."

    Now at that time I am probably 47 or 48, but her little compliment moved me. It was especially touching because she had never wanted me to go off to the Jesuits and she had gotten so mad I went to Africa that she did not speak to any local Jesuit for some years.

    I talk about this on Mothers’ Day because of two reasons.

    First, it shows how at whatever age we are, our mother’s compliments and affirmations remain powerful. My mom’s simple compliment touched my spirit. I can still remember it as if it were yesterday.

    Secondly, it shows how you mothers have the touch. You can ignite people’s spirits into new life with just a movement or a word. It may seem so simple that it is of little value. This event with my mom exemplifies just the contrary, how valuable it is.

    Whom do you touch into new life?

    Download the homily as an mp3 file.

    First_communion

  • Sunday Homily, July 26, 2015, 17th Ordinary Time, B

    Readings:

     2 Kings 4, 42-44,  “They not only ate, but had leftovers.”  

    Psalm 145,    The hand of the Lord feeds us; he answers all our needs.

    Ephesians 4, 1-6,   “Pour yourselves out in acts of love; and be quick to mend fences.”

    Alleluia – “A great prophet has risen in our midst.”

    John 6:1-15 (also in Matt 14:13-21, Mark 6:31-44, Luke 9:10-17) – “Jesus took the bread, and having given thanks, gave it to them.”

     

     

      Genevieve & Mary 2

     

                       Genevieve says, "Hi, Everybody, Welcome."

    Introduction to the readings:

    The Jewish people wanted to have a king like other nations had.  Wasn’t God’s idea; the people kept demanding a king; he let them have a king.  The idea was that the kings, starting with Solomon, would represent the sovereignty of God by being good kings. 

    For 500 years there were 40 or so kings, and of course they were mostly rather pitiful, a few were pretty good.  Today’s reading is from the second book of kings, so during the time when kings ruled the Jewish people, starting with Saul about 1000 years before Jesus, and ending about 500 years later with the Babylonian captivity (555). 

     

    Leo & Shonda

     

           Leo & Shonda, too, say, "Good Morning, Folks, Welcome."

     

     There were prophets and holy men before there were kings.  They are the ones who kept tabs on the kings and represented God’s take on issues. 

    Today’s reading introduces Elisha, a holy man respected by Joram, king of Israel and Jehoshaphat, king of Judah.  This little story of Elisha feeding a crowd of 100 with 20 loaves of bread was chosen to connect with the story of the multiplication of loaves in the today’s Gospel story. And the letter to the Ephesians teaches what sharing in the meal should signify and bring about in one’s behavior.

      Emma & Friend 1

    Emma, too, says that she and her buddy welcome everyone.

     

    HOMILY:

    We have heard many times the reading about the miracle of the multiplication of the loaves and the fish.  This is the only miracle story repeated in all four Gospels. 

    How appropriate that feeding those needing food was the best miracle story known; it could be told today with equal impact.  I forget the stats, but it’s millions of people, including children, who are hungry every day and without food (who knows the number or percent). 

     

    Harper 1

                      Harper says she thinks it is fun being here.

     

    Also in each of these four repetitions of the story, there is a formula or ritual stated: “Jesus raised his face to heaven in prayer, blessed, broke, and gave the bread to his disciples.”

    So first, the story is a story about Jesus performing a miracle, which is how writers in those days made someone ‘famously big’ or a ‘god to be reckoned with’. 

    Secondly, this story was well known, since all four Gospel writers or compilers used it. 

    And thirdly, one line in the story became part of the shared meal starting with early Christians all the way down to today. 

     

    Tori & Mom

                Victoria having just too much fun with her mom.

     

    The reading from Paul’s letter to the Ephesians, liturgically, seems to teach what flows from sharing in this ritual meal.  And his answer is unity, recognizing that we are called to be one body, united in love.  Paul describes our call from God as pouring yourself out for each other in acts of love, accepting other’s differences and being quick to forgive.

     Three questions to mull over: 

    In your family (at home, here, friends group) how do you see acts of love being shared, and differences accepted?  

    How quick are you to mend fences and forgive one another? 

    Do you make the connection between sharing bread here at Mass, and experiencing connection and oneness with others in your everyday life?

            

      Genevieve asleep

    Genevieve, who has learned already from previous Sundays how to turn it off, says, "Wake me up when the fun begins."

     

  • Sunday Homily, April 22, 2007 – 3rd Sunday of Easter

    Readings: Acts 5, 27-41; Psalm 30; Revelation 5, 11-14; John 21, 1-19

    Acts of the Apostles

    This book continues Luke’s gospel, this time describing the early Christian community.

    Revelations

    More revelations about end times and heavenly events.

    Do You Love Me X 3

    How many here love chocolate chip cookies?

    How many here love their dog or cat?

    How many here love Rosemary?

    Notice the different meanings of the same word "love." In the early language in which this section of John was written two words are used for "love." You can see that in English we often use "love" when we really mean "like." I like chocolate chip cookies, but I love Rosemary.

    Watch how the meaning changes and becomes much more subtle when you distinguish the word. In the early language the word for "love" was "agapo." A second word was "phileo," and it meant "care for" or "hold you very special."

    Here we go. First, Jesus says, "Do you love me more than these." He uses "agapo." Peter responds, "You know that I love you." Guess which word Peter uses. Not "agapo," meaning "love," but phileo, meaning "hold you special" or "care for."

    Secondly, Jesus asks again, "Do you love me," and uses "agapo." Note he does not repeat "more than these." Peter repeats his first statement, "You know that I love you." Again he uses the word "phileo," I "care for you."

    Now the third time takes place, and in English Jesus simply asks "Do you love me," but guess what. He uses "phileo" this time, "Do you care for me?" What does Peter respond? Same as the first two times, "I care for you," though this is not distinguished in the English translation.

    Big difference, no? A fascinating play on words English totally misses. What is going on? A simplistic idea is that Peter denied Jesus three times. So here he is challenged to affirm Jesus three times. However, why the play on the word love?

    1. Can Peter be showing a new side, a more humble side?
    2. Is Jesus showing that he accepts Peter just as he is, saint as well as sinner?
    3. Could this be consoling for us who fall like Peter?
    4. How are we like Peter?

    Click here to download the audio.